The secular and democratic claims of India
will be exposed as hollow if Muslims wrongly implicated in criminal/terror
cases are not rendered full justice. In most of the cases, police does not
follow the Supreme Court guidelines in picking up Muslim youths. The Supreme Court
guidelines on arrest say that within 8-12 hours of making any arrests the
police must inform the family of the person concerned about his arrest and the
location where she/he has been kept by the police. These arrests were also in
violation of the UN's International Convention for the Protection of All
Persons from Enforced Disappearance, of which India is a signatory. Police
implicate them in dozen of cases in one go and after a long span of time the accused
prove their innocence. Sadly, they continue to lead a life of ignominy even after
their acquittal.
The government should evolve a mechanism to
decipher between reliable and concocted evidences and cases in which innocent
Muslims are kept under detention for years without being charge-sheeted should
be dispensed immediately. In its overly dramatic reporting, the media also
comes out with insensitive and irresponsible reports peppered with inaccuracies.
Media should realize its duty to save the dying credibility of journalism and
hope to restore public faith in it. Every time there is a blast or riot, Muslims
are falsely implicated and are branded anti-national. In cases where the court has held that
evidence has been concocted or misrepresented by the investigating agencies to
implicate innocents, action must be taken against those responsible. The governments-Central
or the concerned State- must issue an apology for the grievous loss of dignity
and livelihood that innocents have suffered on account of the false charges
foisted upon them. All police officers who have engaged in torture, illegal
detentions, forced custodial confessions and fabricated evidence should be
suspended, booked and tried under the law. The recommendation of the National
Commission for Minorities that the compensation amount be recovered from the
salaries of the policemen responsible for falsely implicating the young men
should be implemented. Can one be compensated for the physical, mental and
social torture that one was subjected to and for the hardships faced in jail?
Government should go one step ahead and provide them government jobs according
to their eligibility. This is an issue which the Government and the larger polity
cannot afford to ignore.
For your reading, The Hindu Editorial dated 20-09-2013
Compensating victims
After appearing
to have encroached on matters within the realm of the executive, the Andhra
Pradesh High Court did well to recall an earlier order that struck down the
award of compensation to 70 Muslim young men who were wrongly arrested in
connection with the 2007 Hyderabad Mecca Masjid blast case. The court seems to
have realised that such awards are not expressly prohibited by law, and that
the government needed no particular “legal basis” for paying compensation to
citizens who have been the unfortunate victims of wrongful arrest and torture
in criminal cases. Neither the fact of their arrest nor the proof of their
innocence was in dispute. The actual perpetrators of the blasts had since been
identified and were on trial. The withdrawal of the compensation was thus bad
in law and effectively subverted the ends of justice. Admittedly, the court’s
initial objection was technical: the victims, it said, were free to file a
civil case for compensation. While it is true that mere acquittal or discharge
from a case does not entitle an arrested person to compensation, this was not
merely a case where the prosecution had failed to prove its charges in a court
of law. It was not just that the guilt of the men was not proven, but also that
their innocence was now established beyond doubt. When the State is free to
compensate victims of accidents and natural calamities, why can it not do the
same for those who have suffered injustice at the hands of its own police
force? In the past, courts too have intervened to provide compensation to
victims of State violence.
But the larger
issue of accountability of police officials responsible for the wrongful arrest
and torture of the innocent Muslim young men remains. Justice demands that the
police officers who unthinkingly put innocent young men through such a
harrowing time be made answerable. Torture is illegal and policemen who use
cruel and unusual methods of interrogation must be prosecuted. The speed with
which the police arrested Muslim men when the perpetrators of the blast were
Hindutva sympathisers shows how deeply ingrained the automatic association of
Muslims with terrorism is among law-enforcers. The award of compensation was
just one small step toward correcting this and sensitising the police force,
sections of which are vulnerable to communalisation. Indeed, the National
Commission for Minorities had recommended that the compensation amount be
recovered from the salaries of the policemen responsible for falsely
implicating the young men. The A.P. government’s decision to award compensation
must be established as a healthy precedent, and police officers who use torture
to extract ‘confessions’ should be made to face civil and criminal liability.
No comments:
Post a Comment